1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Orders Reconsideration of Denied Import License Applications; Policy Committee Given Three Months to Review.</h1> The HC of Bombay quashed the impugned decisions/orders denying the petitioners' applications for import license conditions. It directed the Policy ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative remedy - Rejection of petitioners' applications for import license conditions - actual user conditions - HELD THAT:- Admittedly, the PRC did not hear the petitioners before rejecting their applications vide the impugned decisions/orders dated 4 April 2024. At the relevant time, paragraph 2.59 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), 2023, contemplated a hearing before the PRC decided on the issue of relaxation. The same is substantially continued in paragraph 2.60 of the current FTP - The petitioners had already approached the PRC, which rejected their applications without hearing them. On the short ground that the petitioners were required to be heard, and they were not heard, the impugned decisions/orders dated 4 April 2024 set aside and the petitionersβ applications for relaxation/deletion/removal of the actual user conditions in their licenses to the PRC restored. The PRC must hear the petitions/their representatives and decide the petitionersβ applications following law and on their own merits. The High Court of Bombay quashed impugned decisions/orders rejecting petitioners' applications for import license conditions. The court directed the Policy Relaxation Committee of DGFT to hear petitioners and decide applications within three months. The court did not consider merits of the matters. No costs were awarded.