Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court Upholds Delhi HC's Interpretation of Section 271-AAA(2) of Income Tax Act; No Interference Needed.</h1> <h3>AMUL GABRANI Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9</h3> AMUL GABRANI Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 - [2025] 472 ITR 13 (SC) The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, concurring with the Delhi High Court's interpretation of sub-section 2 of Section 271-AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Delay was condoned, and no interference was found necessary under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.