Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount recovered from the petitioner could be retained without appropriation in accordance with law, and whether recovery action required issuance of a show cause notice before final demand or refund consequences could follow.
Analysis: The amount collected from the petitioner could not be retained without lawful appropriation. Before appropriating the recovered sum, the authority was required to issue a proper show cause notice. The petitioner was also given liberty to raise all available legal defences in the ensuing proceedings. The Court directed the respondents to proceed under the GST provisions and complete the exercise within the stipulated time, with final adjudication on merits thereafter.
Conclusion: The respondents were directed to initiate proper show cause proceedings and act in accordance with law before retaining the recovered amount. If the demand is dropped, the amount is to be refunded to the petitioner.