Additional surcharge on open access electricity consumers treated as part of exempt electricity supply, not a separate taxable GST service.

Additional surcharge collected from open access consumers was treated as a statutory levy linked to the exempt supply and distribution of electricity, not as consideration for an independent taxable supply under GST. The AAAR found no agreement, express or implied, under which the consumer paid the surcharge for tolerating an act or situation, and the charge was instead meant to recover the distribution licensee's stranded fixed costs. As the surcharge was incidental to the exempt electricity supply, it formed part of that exempt activity and could not be taxed separately.

---

---

Issues: Whether the additional surcharge collected from open access consumers is a taxable supply under the GST law or whether it forms part of the consideration for the exempt supply and distribution of electricity, and is therefore not taxable.

Analysis: The additional surcharge was found to arise from statutory and regulatory provisions governing open access and was meant to recover the stranded fixed cost of the distribution licensee. The collection was not linked to any independent agreement to tolerate an act or situation, and no express or implied arrangement existed for the appellant to permit an act in return for consideration. The surcharge was held to be an incidental levy connected with the main activity of supply and distribution of electricity. Since electricity supply and distribution are exempt supplies, and the surcharge was treated as part of the taxable value of that exempt supply, it could not be separately taxed as consideration for tolerating an act.

Conclusion: The additional surcharge is not taxable as an independent supply under GST and is to be treated as part of the exempt supply and distribution of electricity.

---