Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on steel, cement and allied items used in the construction of storage tanks and pollution control equipment.
Analysis: The factual finding recorded was that the disputed items were used for constructing iron/coke storage tanks, gas storage tanks and pollution control equipment, and not for ordinary civil construction. Such storage tanks and pollution control equipment fall within the definition of capital goods, and the materials used in their construction qualify as inputs used in the manufacture of capital goods for use within the factory. In the absence of any contrary evidence from the Revenue, and in view of the settled legal position that such inputs are eligible for credit, denial of credit and consequential penalty could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The credit was admissible and the denial thereof was incorrect; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Materials used in constructing capital goods installed and used within the factory qualify for Cenvat credit as inputs, and such credit cannot be denied merely because the resulting structure is fixed or immovable when the underlying capital goods category is otherwise covered.