Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final assessment order passed under section 144C(13) was time-barred because the DRP directions were treated as received on the date of upload on the ITBA portal, and whether the assessment completed on 01.07.2022 was within the statutory period.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the point of time when the DRP directions were dispatched and received in the faceless assessment system. Applying the principles governing electronic records under section 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, read with the faceless assessment framework under section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the relevant date was the date on which the DRP order was uploaded on the ITBA portal. On that basis, the statutory period under section 144C(13) commenced from the end of the month of such upload, and the final assessment order had to be passed within the prescribed time. The record showed that the order was passed after the limitation period had expired.
Conclusion: The final assessment order was held to be barred by limitation and therefore invalid.