Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could survive when it travelled beyond the allegations and amount stated in the show cause notice, in the face of Section 75(7) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The assessment order determined a higher amount than what was proposed in the show cause notice and proceeded on findings beyond its scope. Section 75(7) requires the adjudicating authority to confine the final order to the grounds and amount put to notice. The petitioner's challenge was therefore accepted on the ground of statutory non-compliance.
Conclusion: The assessment order was unsustainable and was set aside. The authority was directed to re-hear the petitioner, consider all objections, and pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded on the jurisdictional defect in the assessment process, and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication by the competent authority.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudicating authority cannot confirm a demand on grounds or for an amount that exceeds the scope of the show cause notice, and any such order is liable to be set aside for breach of Section 75(7) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.