Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of service tax on ocean freight, with denial of 70% abatement under Notification No. 26/2012-ST, should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication in view of the prior Tribunal order and the decision holding the levy unconstitutional.
Analysis: The demand related to service tax on ocean freight for transportation of imported goods. The Tribunal noted that the Gujarat High Court had held the levy itself to be unconstitutional in SAL Steel Ltd., and that in the assessee's own earlier case the matter had already been remanded for reconsideration. As the legal position had changed and the same issue was already sent back for fresh decision, the impugned order required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The appeal was allowed by way of remand and the impugned order was set aside.