Forward Foreign Exchange Contract losses qualify as short-term capital loss under Section 74

The ITAT Mumbai held that loss from Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts (FCC) constitutes short-term capital loss. The assessee, a registered Foreign Portfolio Investor, entered FCC with a bank to hedge foreign currency fluctuation risk. The Tribunal relied on precedents from Citicorp Investment Bank and D.B. International cases, which treated gains from forward contracts as capital gains. Applying this principle consistently, losses from such contracts must be treated as capital losses eligible for carry forward under capital gains head. Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues:
1. Classification of loss from Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts as short-term capital loss.

Analysis:
The appellate tribunal heard an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2020-21. The Revenue raised grounds questioning the treatment of a loss as a short-term capital loss. The primary issue in the appeal was the classification of the loss arising from Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts (FCC) as a short-term capital loss.

The assessee, a UK-based subsidiary engaged in investment activities in India, entered into FCC with HDFC Bank Ltd to hedge investments in Indian securities. The assessee incurred a loss from FCC during the year under consideration, which it carried forward as a short-term capital loss. The Assessing Officer disagreed with the assessee's treatment, considering the gains from FCC as income from other sources. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the appeal, following precedent cases, and classified the loss as a short-term capital loss eligible for carry forward under the head "capital gains."

The tribunal analyzed the nature of income from FCC settlement, citing decisions where similar transactions were treated as capital gains. The tribunal referred to cases where gains from forward exchange contracts were assessed as capital gains, supporting the assessee's argument. The tribunal emphasized that the mere pendency of appeals against previous decisions does not invalidate the current findings. Therefore, the tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the tribunal upheld the classification of the loss from FCC as a short-term capital loss, in line with previous decisions and legal principles. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the treatment of the loss under the head "capital gains."

---