Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail in connection with alleged offences under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The application arose from allegations that tax collected from service recipients had not been deposited with the Government. The investigation had concluded, the alleged offence was punishable with a maximum term of five years, and the Court found no apprehension of flight risk or requirement for further recovery or discovery from the applicant. The Court also noted that recovery of the alleged tax dues is governed by the statutory recovery mechanism under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and that the applicant had already made partial payment and undertaken to deposit further within a short period. Relying on settled bail principles, including that prolonged incarceration before trial should not amount to pre-trial conviction and that personal liberty under Article 21 must be preserved, the Court found the case fit for the exercise of bail jurisdiction.
Conclusion: Regular bail was granted to the applicant, subject to conditions including execution of bond, surety, reporting requirements, travel restrictions, and deposit of the stated amount.