Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The documents on record showed that the petitioner had not been effectively heard before the impugned order was passed. In view of that denial of opportunity, the matter warranted remand, but the petitioner was required to comply with a condition of remittance of 10% of the disputed tax demand and to file a reply within the stipulated time. On such compliance, the respondent was to afford a reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and pass a fresh order.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration subject to the specified condition.