Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be quashed for breach of principles of natural justice, and what consequential relief should follow.
Analysis: The materials on record showed that no effective personal hearing had been afforded before the impugned order was passed. As the demand had already been appropriated from the petitioner's bank account, revenue interest stood secured. In these circumstances, the order could not be sustained and the matter required reconsideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the show cause notice and to be heard.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment after granting the petitioner a reply opportunity and personal hearing.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained setting aside of the order and a fresh adjudication on remand, while the appropriated amount was left to abide by the result of the remand proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without affording an effective opportunity of hearing is liable to be set aside, and where revenue is already secured, the proper course is remand for fresh decision after compliance with natural justice.