Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the continued suspension of the petitioner's registration was unjustified in view of the pending show cause notice proceedings, and whether the respondents were required to conclude those proceedings within the statutory period under Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Analysis: The petitioner had submitted replies to the show cause notice on more than one occasion, followed by a reminder, yet the proceedings were not concluded. In view of the obligation under Rule 22 to examine the replies and complete the proceedings within the prescribed time, the continued suspension of registration could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The continued suspension of the petitioner's registration was held to be unjustified, and the respondents were directed to examine the replies and dispose of the show cause notice proceedings within three weeks.