Assessment reopening set aside for ignoring petitioner's response on interest income tax; matter remanded under Section 147

The HC set aside the impugned order reopening the assessment, finding that the AO failed to consider the petitioner's response that the interest income was already assessed to tax. The matter was remanded to the AO to reconsider the petitioner's reply and pass a reasoned order within four weeks after necessary inquiries. The petitioner's challenge to the AO's jurisdiction remains pending in a batch of cases, but the HC allowed the reassessment proceedings to continue subject to any future order on jurisdiction. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with pending applications also dismissed.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of order passed under Section 148A (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to initiate re-assessment proceedings after a specific notification.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Validity of Order under Section 148A (d):
The petitioner challenged an order dated 31.08.2024 passed under Section 148A (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, initiating re-assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2018-19. The petitioner contended that the order was passed without considering their reply and that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked jurisdiction to initiate the proceedings post a specific Central Board of Direct Taxes notification. The court found merit in the petitioner's claim that the AO did not adequately consider the petitioner's response before passing the impugned order. Despite the petitioner's submission that the income in question had already been assessed to tax, the AO failed to acknowledge this fact. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the AO for a fresh consideration of the petitioner's reply within a specified timeframe.

Issue 2: Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer:
Regarding the jurisdiction of the AO to initiate re-assessment proceedings post the notification dated 29.03.2022, the court noted that this issue was pending consideration in a batch of matters. However, the court decided not to halt the ongoing proceedings based on this ground. The court directed that the proceedings initiated for the assessment year 2018-19 would continue, subject to any future orders in the batch of matters concerning the AO's jurisdiction. The court preserved the petitioner's rights and contentions on this matter for future consideration. Ultimately, the petition was disposed of in the mentioned terms, and any pending applications were also resolved accordingly.

---