Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the grievance arising from issuance of the same PAN number to two persons survived for adjudication, and whether a direction was required to facilitate correction of the petitioner's CIBIL credit score.
Analysis: The petitioner's complaint regarding duplicate allotment of the PAN number stood resolved during the pendency of the petition when the department ed the petitioner as the first allottee, cancelled the inadvertent allotment made to the other person, and allotted a new PAN to that person. As the duplication had caused an adverse impact on the petitioner's credit profile, the Court directed the Income Tax Department to forward a letter to CIBIL within one month clarifying that the same PAN had been issued erroneously and that the department had no objection to correction of the petitioner's credit score. The petitioner was also left at liberty to approach the concerned authorities for correction of the CIBIL record.
Conclusion: The grievance relating to duplicate PAN allotment was resolved, and a consequential direction was issued to the Income Tax Department to inform CIBIL for correction of the petitioner's credit score.