Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (10) TMI 699 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Foreign bandwidth charges not royalty under section 9(1)(vi), no tax deduction required following precedent The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple tax deduction issues. Regarding bandwidth charges paid to foreign telecom providers, the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Foreign bandwidth charges not royalty under section 9(1)(vi), no tax deduction required following precedent

                          The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple tax deduction issues. Regarding bandwidth charges paid to foreign telecom providers, the tribunal held these cannot be treated as royalty under section 9(1)(vi), following the Delhi HC decision in Telstra Singapore case, thus no tax deduction at source was required. For annual maintenance charges paid to foreign companies, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to examine whether services qualify as technical/managerial/consultancy services, as this preliminary issue was not properly examined earlier. On agency fees paid to foreign banks, the tribunal upheld the FAA's finding that since Indian branches played no role in loan arrangements, no tax deduction obligation arose.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Taxability of bandwidth charges as royalty income under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Taxability of annual maintenance charges (AMC) as Fee for Technical Services (FTS).
                          3. Non-deduction of tax on payment of agency fees.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Taxability of Bandwidth Charges as Royalty Income:

                          The primary issue was whether the bandwidth charges remitted by the assessee to foreign telecom service providers should be treated as royalty income under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer held that these payments were in the nature of royalty, as they involved the use or right to use equipment or process, thus requiring tax deduction at source at 20%. However, the first appellate authority partially disagreed, stating that such payments could only be considered royalty if the foreign service providers were located in non-treaty countries. The Tribunal, relying on the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT Vs. Telstra Singapore Pte. Ltd., concluded that bandwidth charges do not constitute royalty either under domestic law or relevant DTAAs, as they do not involve a transfer of rights over technology or infrastructure. Therefore, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source on these remittances.

                          2. Taxability of Annual Maintenance Charges (AMC) as FTS:

                          The second issue concerned the taxability of AMC payments to foreign entities as FTS, which would necessitate tax deduction at source. The Assessing Officer considered these payments as FTS, while the first appellate authority examined the 'make available' condition under the DTAAs with Israel and Sweden. The authority found that AMC services did not 'make available' technical knowledge, as they primarily involved repair and replacement. However, the Tribunal noted that the nature of services, whether technical, managerial, or consultancy, had not been thoroughly examined due to the assessee's focus on the 'make available' condition. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a detailed factual verification, allowing the assessee to present evidence that the services were non-technical.

                          3. Non-deduction of Tax on Payment of Agency Fees:

                          The final issue dealt with the non-deduction of tax on agency fees paid to foreign banks. The assessee argued that these payments were business income for the recipients, who lacked a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, thus not attracting tax deduction. The first appellate authority agreed, noting that the Indian branches of the banks did not participate in the transactions, and therefore, no part of the agency fee could be attributed to them. The Tribunal upheld this decision, as the Revenue failed to provide evidence countering the factual findings of the first appellate authority.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal in part, holding that bandwidth charges were not royalty and remanding the AMC issue for further examination. It dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the non-taxability of agency fees due to the lack of involvement by Indian branches of the foreign banks. The order was pronounced in the open court on 9th October, 2024.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found