Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from technical inspection and integrity assessment services were taxable as fee for technical services or as business income under the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and whether the absence of a permanent establishment in India barred taxation in India.
Analysis: The receipts were found to arise from technical services, but the services did not satisfy the make available requirement under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. On that basis, the receipts could not be taxed under the treaty as fee for technical services. They were instead held to fall within Article 7 as business profits. Since the assessee had no permanent establishment in India, the business profits were not taxable in India. The revenue did not controvert the factual findings recorded by the first appellate authority.
Conclusion: The receipts were correctly treated as business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where technical services do not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the recipient, the receipts are not taxable as fee for technical services under the treaty and, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, are taxable only as business profits in the residence state.