Export obligation waiver for bamboo processing machines under EPCG Scheme gets consideration direction

Gauhati HC disposed of writ petitions challenging export obligation and duty-saved amount waiver for bamboo processing machines imported under Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme. Petitioners argued they should receive grants instead of returnable Technical Developmental Assistance, particularly for North-Eastern Region units. Court found petitioners established prima facie case for waiver consideration without determining merits or promissory estoppel claims. HC directed Customs Department to consider petitioners' claims and pass reasoned order within eight weeks. Interim protection against coercive action continued until determination. Petition disposed with directions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Grievances of the Bamboo Industries Association regarding lack of government assistance and financial support.
2. Entitlement of waiver of export obligation and duty-saved amount for import of bamboo processing machines under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme.
3. Alleged withdrawal of promised benefits by the Union Government affecting the bamboo industry.
4. Consideration of the petitioners' case for waiver by the competent authority in the Customs Department.

Analysis:
1. The Bamboo Industries Association, aggrieved by the lack of proper attention and assistance from the Central Government, raised concerns about financial difficulties due to the form of assistance provided and initiation of recovery proceedings by the authorities. The petitioners sought resolution through representation to the competent authority.

2. Another petitioner, a member of the Association, filed a writ petition claiming entitlement to waiver of export obligation and duty-saved amount for importing bamboo processing machines under the EPCG Scheme. The petitioner's industry focused on manufacturing bamboo products, particularly bamboo blinds.

3. The petitioners alleged that the Union Government reneged on promises of support and assistance, leading to adverse effects on the industry's operations and potential closure. The Customs Department's initiation of recovery proceedings despite ongoing waiver processes added to the petitioners' grievances.

4. The Court considered the petitioners' claims and the communication highlighting the industry's challenges, including the need for special concessions in the North Eastern Region. The Court directed the competent authority in the Customs Department to consider the petitioners' case for waiver and issue a decision within eight weeks, maintaining the interim order against coercive actions during this period.

5. The judgment emphasized that it did not delve into the merits of the claims or counterclaims but allowed the petitioners to raise these issues in any future litigation. The writ petitions were disposed of, with each party bearing its costs, and the petitioners were granted the opportunity for further legal recourse if needed.

---