TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the MEIS reward claim on account of blank shipping bills warranted a fresh examination by the authority and a speaking order.
Analysis: The claim arose under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme framed under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act and the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20. The shipping bills had been left blank by inadvertence, causing the electronic system to treat them as a "No" by default, and the authority had not examined the claim on merits. In these circumstances, the Court directed the respondent to re-examine the 16 EDI shipping bills afresh by treating the petitioner's submissions as a "Yes", after granting a personal hearing and calling for all relevant documents.
Conclusion: The authority was directed to reconsider the petitioner's MEIS entitlement afresh and pass a speaking order within the stipulated time.
TaxTMI 
