Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was barred by limitation and whether the matter required fresh consideration in view of the subsequent circular.
Analysis: The refund claim relating to service tax paid for April to June 2008 was filed after the original 60-day period calculated from 30.06.2008 and was rejected by the lower authorities as time-barred. A later circular clarified the revised limitation position for refund claims pertaining to the relevant quarter and indicated that claims filed within the revised period could be entertained if otherwise in order. As the circular was issued after the lower orders, the claim had not been examined in that light. The limitation issue therefore required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority, along with the merits if the claim was found to be within time, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The rejection on limitation was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision, including reconsideration of limitation.