Developer complies with GST rate reduction requirements under Section 171 CGST Act 2017

The CCI examined whether a developer retained benefits from GST rate reduction or input tax credit (ITC) on construction services under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The DGAP verified that the respondent opted for 5% GST without ITC, reversed all ITC for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19, and complied with Rule 37 of CGST Rules by reversing ITC due to delayed supplier payments. The respondent also corrected clerical errors resulting in negative credit. Since no additional ITC benefit accrued post-GST implementation, Section 171(1) provisions were not attracted and proceedings were dropped.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether there was a benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC on the supply of construction service by the Respondent, on implementation of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017.
2. Whether such benefit was passed on by the Respondent to the recipients, in terms of Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Benefit of Reduction in Tax Rate or ITC:
The DGAP's investigation revealed that the Respondent opted for GST @ 5% without ITC as per Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. The Respondent reversed all the ITC available from the financial years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 starting from April 2019. Additionally, the Respondent reversed ITC availed due to a delay of more than 180 days in making payments to suppliers, as per Rule 37 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The DGAP verified the GSTR-3B returns and found that the Respondent had a negative credit during the post-GST period, indicating no net ITC availed by the Respondent in the post-GST period. Therefore, no benefit of additional ITC accrued to the Respondent in respect of the project "Ireo Waterfront."

2. Passing on the Benefit to Recipients:
The DGAP scrutinized the documents and evidence on record and concluded that the Respondent did not retain any ITC related to the "Ireo Waterfront" project and reversed all the ITC availed as of March 2019. The DGAP's report stated that the net input tax availment as on 31.03.2019 was negative, and no net ITC was availed by the Respondent in the post-GST period that could be compared with the pre-GST ITC to determine "profiteering." Consequently, no benefit on account of the availment of ITC needed to be passed on to the home buyers. The Commission, after reviewing the DGAP's report and the statutory returns filed by the Respondent, concluded that the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, are not attracted in the Respondent's project "Ireo Waterfront."

Conclusion:
The Commission determined that post-GST, no benefit of additional ITC accrued to the Respondent in respect of the project "Ireo Waterfront." Therefore, the proceedings in the present case were dropped, and the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, were not applicable. The order was sent to all interested parties, and the case file was consigned after completion.

---