Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (10) TMI 32 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's revenue recognition under AS-7 and advance accounting under AS-9 upheld, depreciation on intangible assets allowed under Section 32 The ITAT Delhi upheld the assessee's revenue recognition method under AS-7 (Percentage Completion Method) for elevator contracts, finding it consistently ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessee's revenue recognition under AS-7 and advance accounting under AS-9 upheld, depreciation on intangible assets allowed under Section 32

                          The ITAT Delhi upheld the assessee's revenue recognition method under AS-7 (Percentage Completion Method) for elevator contracts, finding it consistently followed and previously approved. The Tribunal sustained the assessee's accounting for Annual Maintenance Contract advances under AS-9, where amounts are initially recorded as advances and proportionately transferred to revenue monthly. Disallowances for TDS recoverable write-offs and depreciation on intangible assets were also decided in favor of the assessee, with the latter supported by HC precedent in Areva T D India Limited and SC decision in Smifs Securities Limited regarding depreciation eligibility under Section 32.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 15,23,35,414 as 'Advance received from Customers'.
                          2. Disallowance of Rs. 8,51,913 under 'TDS recoverable written off'.
                          3. Levy of interest under sections 234B & 234D and withdrawal of interest under section 244A.
                          4. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 2,71,50,036 on account of depreciation claimed on intangible assets.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 15,23,35,414 as 'Advance received from Customers':

                          The assessee company contested the addition of Rs. 15,23,35,414 made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) as 'Advance received from Customers' under contracts, which the assessee argued did not constitute revenue/income for the relevant assessment year. The CIT(A) failed to appreciate the system of accounting followed by the assessee, the terms of the contracts, and the nature of the business. The CIT(A) ignored orders from earlier years regarding the following of Accounting Standards by the assessee. The High Court of Delhi had accepted the accounting treatment given by the assessee to 'Advance received from Customers' in earlier years, relying on the decision of Taparia Tools Ltd. (SC) (2015) 55 Taxmann.com 361. The Tribunal had also upheld this method of accounting in previous years, and any deviation would lead to a mismatch of cost with revenues. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 15,23,35,414.

                          2. Disallowance of Rs. 8,51,913 under 'TDS recoverable written off':

                          The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of Rs. 8,51,913 debited under 'TDS recoverable written off'. The CIT(A) mechanically followed orders from earlier assessment years without appreciating the nature of the expense. The amounts equivalent to the TDS were withheld by customers but were neither deposited in the government treasury nor claimed by the assessee in earlier years. The write-off was allowable under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2) of the Act. The Tribunal had previously dealt with this issue in favor of the assessee for A.Y. 2008-09. Thus, the ground was sustainable.

                          3. Levy of interest under sections 234B & 234D and withdrawal of interest under section 244A:

                          The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of interest under sections 234B & 234D and the withdrawal of interest under section 244A. However, the judgment does not provide specific details on the Tribunal's final decision regarding this ground.

                          4. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 2,71,50,036 on account of depreciation claimed on intangible assets:

                          The Department of Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 2,71,50,036 made by the AO on account of depreciation claimed on intangible assets. The assessee argued that this issue was covered in its favor for A.Y. 2008-09. The High Court had previously held that the maintenance contracts acquired by the assessee as part of a slump sale constituted the basis of income-earning apparatus and were entitled to depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The Tribunal upheld this view, and the ground was not sustainable.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Department of Revenue and allowed the appeal of the assessee. The order was pronounced on 27th September 2024.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found