Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order confirming the tax proposal required interference for want of proper opportunity and whether the matter should be restored for fresh consideration on conditions.
Analysis: The impugned order was passed after the petitioner did not respond to the show cause notice. In view of the explanation regarding non-participation and the need to ensure fairness, the matter was found fit for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand, file a reply to the show cause notice, and thereafter receive a reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, before a fresh order was passed. The bank attachment was also directed to be raised consequentially.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication on the stated conditions, with consequential relief against bank attachment.