Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (9) TMI 1441 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT allows rectification under section 254, reduces share valuation from Rs. 131.86 to Rs. 70.59 per share using Rule 11UA methodology ITAT Delhi allowed assessee's rectification application under section 254, modifying the fair market value of shares from Rs. 131.86 to Rs. 70.59 per ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT allows rectification under section 254, reduces share valuation from Rs. 131.86 to Rs. 70.59 per share using Rule 11UA methodology

                            ITAT Delhi allowed assessee's rectification application under section 254, modifying the fair market value of shares from Rs. 131.86 to Rs. 70.59 per share for capital gains computation. The Tribunal found the original Department workings contained fallacies as they were not in accordance with Rule 11UA of Income Tax Rules, 1962. The Tribunal noted it had always intended to adopt Rule 11UA methodology using NAV method, and the same shares were valued at Rs. 70.59 in spouse's case using proper Rule 11UA calculations. The rectification was deemed an arithmetical correction of mistake apparent from record.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Recall of the Tribunal's order.
                            2. Errors in the valuation of shares.
                            3. Application of Rule 11UA.
                            4. Tribunal's direction on valuation methodology.
                            5. Tribunal's reliance on Department's working.
                            6. Tribunal's rejection of Kotak Mahindra's valuation.
                            7. Tribunal's decision in the case of Mrs. Neelu Analjit Singh.
                            8. Tribunal's power to rectify mistakes under Section 254(2).

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Recall of the Tribunal's Order:
                            The assessee sought to recall the Tribunal's order dated 01.12.2017 in ITA No. 4737/Del/2017, claiming errors apparent from the record regarding the valuation of shares sold and the resultant long-term capital gains. The Tribunal had partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the CIT(A)'s order dated 07.07.2017 for the assessment year 2014-15.

                            2. Errors in the Valuation of Shares:
                            The assessee argued that the Tribunal's order contained errors in the valuation of shares of Scorpio Beverages Pvt. Ltd. (SBPL), which led to an incorrect computation of long-term capital gains. Specifically, the assessee contended that the Tribunal had adopted a fair market value (FMV) of Rs. 131.86 per share, which was flawed due to incorrect figures and the exclusion of certain liabilities.

                            3. Application of Rule 11UA:
                            The assessee highlighted that the Tribunal had directed the Department to compute the FMV of the shares in accordance with Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. However, the Department's computation was alleged to have errors, including incorrect figures and the exclusion of liabilities such as preference share capital and arrears of dividends.

                            4. Tribunal's Direction on Valuation Methodology:
                            The Tribunal had rejected the valuation report by Kotak Mahindra, which used a hybrid method (DCF for VIL shares and NAV for intermediary companies), stating that it did not align with Rule 11UA. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 11UA was specific for valuing unquoted shares and directed the Department to follow this rule.

                            5. Tribunal's Reliance on Department's Working:
                            The Tribunal had relied on the Department's working, which valued SBPL shares at Rs. 131.86 per share. However, the assessee argued that this working was flawed and did not comply with Rule 11UA. The Tribunal acknowledged that the Department's working had been accepted without any rebuttal from the assessee at that time.

                            6. Tribunal's Rejection of Kotak Mahindra's Valuation:
                            The Tribunal had rejected Kotak Mahindra's valuation of SBPL shares at Rs. 5.40 per share, stating that it was not in accordance with Rule 11UA. The Tribunal directed the Department to provide a correct valuation using Rule 11UA, which resulted in the FMV of Rs. 131.86 per share.

                            7. Tribunal's Decision in the Case of Mrs. Neelu Analjit Singh:
                            In the case of Mrs. Neelu Analjit Singh, who had also sold SBPL shares, the Tribunal had directed the AO to verify figures from audited balance sheets and compute the FMV according to Rule 11UA. The AO determined the FMV at Rs. 70.59 per share in the giving effect order dated 12.02.2020. The assessee sought a similar rectification in his case.

                            8. Tribunal's Power to Rectify Mistakes under Section 254(2):
                            The Tribunal acknowledged that the errors in the Department's working constituted mistakes apparent from the record, warranting rectification under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the AO to adopt the FMV of Rs. 70.59 per share and recompute the capital gains accordingly, modifying the original order dated 01.12.2017.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the assessee's miscellaneous application, directing the AO to adopt the FMV of Rs. 70.59 per share for SBPL shares and recompute the capital gains. The order dated 01.12.2017 was modified accordingly.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found