Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders confirming the tax demand for the assessment period 2017-2018 were liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The orders were passed after the petitioner did not respond to the intimation or the show cause notice. The discrepancy between the GSTR 3B, GSTR 1 and GSTR 9 returns formed the basis for the demand, but the impugned order did not contain independent reasons supporting the confirmation apart from the failure to reply. In the circumstances, the petitioner was held entitled to an opportunity to contest the demand on merits, subject to terms.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed subject to payment of 10% of the disputed tax demand, and the respondent was directed to afford a reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and pass fresh orders.