Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST demand order was liable to be set aside for want of a reasonable opportunity and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration on payment of 10% of the disputed tax demand.
Analysis: The order recorded that the demand arose from a mismatch between the GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A and that the assessee had not replied to the show cause notice or participated in the proceedings. At the same time, the Court accepted the assessee's plea that an opportunity should be granted to contest the demand on merits, but only by placing the assessee on terms. The Court therefore required remittance of 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks, permitted a reply to the show cause notice, and directed the authority to afford a reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, before passing a fresh order.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside conditionally and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after compliance with the deposit condition and grant of opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained conditional relief against the demand order, but the dispute was sent back for reconsideration instead of being finally decided on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax demand has been passed without effective participation by the assessee, the order may be set aside and the matter remitted with a condition for deposit, while ensuring a reasonable opportunity and personal hearing before fresh adjudication.