Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned tax assessment orders, passed without hearing the petitioner on the merits of the tax proposals, were liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration with an opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The orders were found to have been issued without hearing the petitioner on the merits of the tax proposals. In view of the attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts and the need to afford an opportunity to contest the demand, the petitioner was required to make a preconditioned remittance of 10% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each order. The petitioner was also permitted to submit a reply to the show cause notice within the stipulated period, and the respondent was directed to consider the reply, grant a reasonable opportunity including a personal hearing, and then pass fresh orders.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside, the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after affording reasonable opportunity and personal hearing, and the bank attachment was raised.