Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The petitioner placed on record a reply said to have been submitted before the assessment order, while the revenue relied on the acknowledgment to indicate that the reply was received after the order was issued. The order itself recorded that no reply had been received and proceeded on that basis. In these circumstances, the petitioner was found entitled to an to contest the demand on merits, but on terms requiring deposit of a portion of the disputed demand.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax demand and a fresh opportunity of reply and personal hearing.