Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax could be demanded from the appellant for the period prior to 18-4-2006, and whether interest and penalty could survive if no such tax liability existed.
Analysis: Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 came into force only from 18-4-2006. For the period from 1-1-2005 to 17-4-2006, there was no legal authority to levy service tax on the recipient of taxable services received from abroad. The liability under section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 could not therefore be sustained for the pre-18-4-2006 period. Once the tax demand itself failed, the consequential levy of interest and penalty also had no basis.
Conclusion: The appellant was not liable to pay service tax, interest, or penalty for the period prior to 18-4-2006, and the impugned order was set aside.