Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the impugned GST assessment order, passed without affording personal hearing, was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice; (ii) whether the bank attachment notice, being consequential to the quashed order, could continue to operate.
Issue (i): whether the impugned GST assessment order, passed without affording personal hearing, was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioner had not been given an opportunity of personal hearing before the order was passed. The absence of such hearing was treated as a violation of the principles of natural justice, warranting fresh consideration by the authority.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Issue (ii): whether the bank attachment notice, being consequential to the quashed order, could continue to operate.
Analysis: Once the assessment order was quashed, the attachment notice founded on it could not survive. The attachment was therefore treated as consequential and liable to be lifted.
Conclusion: The bank attachment notice was lifted and the respondent was directed to release the attachment on the petitioner's bank account.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of setting aside the impugned order, remitting the matter for fresh consideration, and removing the consequential bank attachment.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without affording personal hearing violates natural justice and is liable to be set aside, with any consequential attachment based on such order not surviving.