Deduction under Section 80IA allowed but remitted for proper factual verification of windmill commissioning claims

ITAT Ahmedabad addressed deduction u/s 80IA for assessee engaged in manufacturing electronically engraved copper rollers and wind mill business. AO disallowed deduction following Goldmine Share precedent requiring computation after notional brought forward losses. CIT(A) allowed deduction but failed to verify factual aspects regarding commissioning of new windmill and computation requirements for assessment year 2017-18. ITAT upheld favorable precedent principle but remitted matter to CIT(A) for proper factual verification of deduction claims. Revenue's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deduction under Section 80IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 claimed by the assessee.
2. Verification of the factual matrix and computation of the deduction under Section 80IA.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deduction under Section 80IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 claimed by the assessee:
The Revenue appealed against the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) granting the assessee a deduction under Section 80IA amounting to Rs. 1,56,66,658/-. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and job work of electronically engraved copper rollers, filed its return of income declaring Rs. 8,72,74,960/-. The return was processed, and the case was selected for scrutiny. The assessee claimed the deduction under Section 80IA for income generated from its windmill business. The AO disallowed this deduction, relying on the ITAT's decision in ACIT v. Goldmine Shares & Finance (P) Ltd., which required the computation of deduction after considering notional brought forward losses and depreciation. The Ld. CIT(A), however, allowed the deduction following the Hon'ble Madras High Court's decision in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, which stated that losses absorbed in earlier years cannot be notionally brought forward for deduction purposes. The Ld. CIT(A) also considered the ITAT's decisions in the assessee's favor for previous years (2009-10 to 2013-14).

2. Verification of the factual matrix and computation of the deduction under Section 80IA:
The Tribunal noted that the Ld. CIT(A) did not verify the factual aspects of the deduction claim, particularly the commissioning of new windmills and the computation of the deduction. The assessee installed new windmills in the financial year 2013-14, making the assessment year 2017-18 the initial year for claiming the deduction. The Ld. CIT(A) failed to consider these new installations and the last year of deduction for another windmill. The Tribunal emphasized that the Ld. CIT(A)'s powers are co-terminus with those of the AO, requiring a thorough examination of the claim's factual matrix. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Ld. CIT(A) for verifying the claim under Section 80IA, considering all relevant facts and computations.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the Ld. CIT(A) for a detailed factual verification of the assessee's deduction claim under Section 80IA.

Order Pronouncement:
The order was pronounced on 23rd August 2024, in accordance with Rule 34(4) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, at Ahmedabad.

---