Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when the dealer was not given adequate notice and opportunity before completion of assessment, and whether the service of notice satisfied the prescribed procedure.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on a show-cause notice granting seven days to respond, but the material on record indicated that the notice was dispatched only after the date mentioned for response had already been running. No reliable material was produced to show service through e-mail as claimed, and the available record did not establish that the notice was served in the manner required. In these circumstances, the dealer was not afforded a fair and effective opportunity to explain the case before the assessment was finalised. The defect went to the root of the assessment process and amounted to denial of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order could not be sustained and was liable to be set aside. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh assessment after due notice and opportunity to the dealer.