Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Principal Commissioner was justified in invoking revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to revise the assessment on the ground that the Assessing Officer had not correctly applied the presumptive taxation regime under section 44ADA and had not taxed the surrendered income under section 115BBE.
Analysis: The assessment of professional receipts was required to be made in accordance with section 44ADA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which contemplates taxation of eligible professional income on a presumptive basis. The surrendered income arising from search-related disclosures was required to be brought to tax under section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In that view, the Assessing Officer's order was treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, satisfying the jurisdictional requirements for revision under section 263.
Conclusion: The invocation of section 263 was upheld and the challenge to the revisional order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order that does not correctly apply the mandatory tax treatment of presumptive professional income and surrendered income can be revised under section 263 when it is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue.