Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under Section 40 of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could be sustained in the absence of a valid prior assessment or deemed self-assessment under Section 35, and whether the proceedings were barred by limitation under Section 39.
Analysis: Section 29 and Rule 17 required periodical returns within the prescribed time. Section 35 treated an assessment as deemed completed only where all returns, annual returns or revised returns were filed within time and tax due thereon was paid. On the facts, the monthly returns for the relevant year were not filed within the prescribed time, so no self-assessment could be deemed to have been completed in law. Section 40 could be invoked only after an assessment under Sections 34, 35, 36 or 37, making such prior assessment a condition precedent to reassessment. As no valid assessment existed, the very initiation of proceedings under Section 40 lacked jurisdiction. The court also held that the assessment for the year 2014-2015 had become time-barred under Section 39.
Conclusion: Reassessment under Section 40 was invalid, without jurisdiction, and could not be sustained; the impugned reassessment order and demand notice were quashed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment for escaped turnover cannot be made unless there is a valid prior assessment or deemed assessment in law, and statutory limitation for completing assessment must be strictly observed.