Tribunal Remands Case for Fair Hearing, Requires AO to Allow Evidence on Net Profit & Disallowance Issues.

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, remanding the case back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized principles of natural justice, directing the AO to provide the appellant with a fair opportunity to present evidence regarding the estimation of net profit and disallowance under section 24(b). The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contentions and instructed the deletion of the Rs. 2,00,000/- disallowance. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, ensuring the appellant could substantiate their claims before the AO.

---

---

Issues:
1. Confirmation of order under section 147 r.w.s 144 and section 250 of the Act by CIT(A) NFAC.
2. Addition of Rs. 37,19,741/- by estimation of net profit.
3. Disallowance of Rs. 2,00,000/- under section 24(b) of the Act.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Confirmation of order under section 147 r.w.s 144 and section 250 of the Act by CIT(A) NFAC
The appeal was filed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi / CIT(A) passed under section 147 r.w.s 144 and section 250 of the Act. The appellant contended that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the order passed by the AO without considering the submissions made by the appellant. The appellant argued that the AO estimated the profit without valid reasons and failed to acknowledge that the financials were audited with no adverse observations. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, providing the appellant with another opportunity to present evidence and information, emphasizing the principles of natural justice.

Issue 2: Addition of Rs. 37,19,741/- by estimation of net profit
The AO added Rs. 37,19,741/- by estimating the net profit at 9.39% of turnover, based on the average of the last three years' net profit ratio. The appellant contested this addition, highlighting that the nature of the business changed over the years, making the comparison of net profit ratios inaccurate. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's arguments and remitted the disputed issues back to the AO for fresh adjudication, directing the AO to allow the appellant a fair opportunity to present evidence and cooperate in the process.

Issue 3: Disallowance of Rs. 2,00,000/- under section 24(b) of the Act
The CIT(A) disallowed Rs. 2,00,000/- under section 24(b) of the Act, stating that the appellant did not file any return to support the claim. However, the appellant argued that the claim was made in the filed returns under different sections. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contentions and directed the deletion of the disallowance, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of all filed returns and claims.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and providing the appellant with an opportunity to substantiate their case with evidence and information before the Assessing Officer.

---