Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in allowing the miscellaneous petition and deleting the amount covered by the voluntary disclosure certificate from the block assessment.
Analysis: The certificate issued under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997, was already on record before the Tribunal passed its original order, but it had not been taken into account. The omission was treated as a mistake apparent from the record and was capable of rectification. Once the certificate had been accepted under the scheme, the amount covered by it could not be brought to tax again in the block assessment.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in allowing the miscellaneous petition and in directing deletion of the amount covered by the VDIS certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: An omission to consider a certificate already on record constitutes a mistake apparent from the record and may be rectified; income covered by an accepted voluntary disclosure certificate cannot be taxed again in block assessment.