Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment orders were liable to be quashed and whether the petitioner should be permitted to reply to the prior GST notices on payment of a portion of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The writ petitions were disposed of at admission stage. The impugned orders were found to have been passed despite prior GST DRC-01 notices having been served, and the petitioner stated that it was willing to deposit 10% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time. The orders were therefore set aside, with liberty to file a reply within 30 days subject to the stated deposit, and the impugned orders were to be treated as an addendum to the earlier show cause notices.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were quashed and the petitioner was granted an opportunity to reply, subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax; the relief was thus substantially in favour of the petitioner but with conditions.
Final Conclusion: The disputes were not decided on merits, but the impugned orders were annulled and the matter was left open for fresh consideration on the basis of the petitioner's reply and the available materials.
Ratio Decidendi: Where prior notice had been issued and the assessee is afforded a conditional opportunity to reply, the impugned order may be quashed and treated as part of the show cause process so that the matter can be reconsidered on merits.