Agricultural income re-examination ordered after the Tribunal granted fresh hearing and remitted the addition for reconsideration.

Agricultural receipts were treated as income from other sources, but the dispute was not finally decided on merits because the Tribunal accepted that the assessee should receive an effective opportunity of hearing. The matter was restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication after reconsidering the explanation and the notices said to have been missed on the electronic portal. The addition was therefore not sustained as a final finding, and the assessee obtained remand for reconsideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made by treating the assessee's agricultural income as income from other sources should be sustained, or the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration after granting an effective opportunity of hearing.

Analysis: The controversy arose from the assessment of agricultural receipts as undisclosed income after the assessee's explanation was not accepted at the assessment and first appellate stages. Before the Tribunal, the assessee sought one more opportunity on the ground that the departmental notices were not properly noticed through the electronic portal. The Tribunal accepted that request and found it appropriate to restore the dispute to the first appellate authority for reconsideration after affording an opportunity of hearing.

Conclusion: The addition was not finally affirmed on merits, and the issue was remitted to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication. The assessee succeeded to the extent of getting a fresh hearing and partial relief.

---