TDS liability under section 201(1) cannot be raised when provisions reversed and compliance completed in subsequent year

ITAT DELHI dismissed revenue's appeals regarding TDS liability under section 201(1) on provisions made in books of accounts. The assessee created provisions on accrual basis which were reversed in subsequent year when actual invoices were booked and TDS compliance was completed. Following IBM India precedent, CIT(A) held that once TDS is deducted in subsequent year, section 201(1) demand cannot be raised. Interest under section 201(1A) can only be charged until deduction date. TDS provisions don't apply where transactions are reversed/cancelled or parties unknown. CIT(A)'s relief to assessee was upheld.

---

---

Issues:
Appeals against CIT(A) Orders related to assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18 - TDS liability under section 201(1) of the Act.

Analysis:
The Revenue filed four appeals against separate Orders passed by the CIT(A) relating to assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18. The common grounds raised in all the appeals challenged the CIT(A)'s direction to delete the assessee's liability created under section 201(1) of the Act. The Revenue contended that such actions by the CIT(A) were against statutory provisions and not in line with the law. The appeals were heard together for convenience, and a common order was passed. The Assessing Officer had raised demands for TDS and interest under section 201(1)/201(1A) for the mentioned assessment years, based on provisions made in the books of accounts. The assessee argued that TDS compliance was done in the subsequent year when actual invoices were booked, leading to double recovery if asked to pay TDS again. The CIT(A) for the assessment year 2017-18 granted relief to the assessee based on the ITAT Bangalore decision, holding that once TDS was deducted in the subsequent year, demand under section 201(1) could not be raised. The CIT(A) directed the AO not to charge TDS under section 201(1) if TDS had been deposited in the next year on provisions made during the current year.

The CIT(A) granted relief to the assessee on various provisions made, considering factors like reversal of provisions in the next year, unknown deductees, and expenses on which TDS was not applicable. The CIT(A) directed the AO to verify the claims of the appellant and not to charge TDS under section 201(1) if found correct. Regarding interest under section 201(1A), the CIT(A) directed the AO to calculate interest only up to the date of actual TDS payment. The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order, but after hearing both parties, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision. The Tribunal upheld that once TDS was deducted in the subsequent year, demand under section 201(1) could not be raised, and interest under section 201(1A) could only be charged up to the date of deduction. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, stating that the CIT(A) rightly granted relief to the assessee on TDS payment issues, and there was no need for further interference.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders related to TDS liabilities under section 201(1) of the Act for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18.

---