Reassessment based only on a set-aside valuation order cannot stand without independent material or inquiry.

Reassessment additions based solely on a valuation order could not survive once that foundational customs valuation was set aside by the customs appellate authority. The Income Tax Department had made no independent inquiry or collected other material to support the reassessment, so the basis for the additions disappeared. The Rajasthan HC found no independent legal issue requiring interference and held that the Tribunal's liberty for future action, if customs proceedings later succeeded, did not create a substantial question of law. The Revenue's appeal remained dismissed, leaving the assessee in favour.

---

---

Issues: Whether any substantial question of law arose from the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal challenging reassessment additions made solely on the basis of the valuation order, when the foundation order had been set aside by the customs appellate authority.

Analysis: The additions under reassessment were made only on the basis of the valuation determined by the adjudicating authority, and the Income Tax Department had not conducted any independent inquiry or collected other material. Once the foundational valuation order was quashed by the customs appellate authority, the basis of the reassessment additions disappeared. The appeal was not shown to raise any independent legal issue warranting interference, and the liberty granted by the Tribunal for fresh action in the event of a future success in the customs proceedings did not alter the absence of a substantial question of law.

Conclusion: No substantial question of law arose. The dismissal of the Revenue's appeal was upheld, in favour of the assessee.

---