Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (8) TMI 415 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Re-assessment under section 148 invalid for capital gains on same property already assessed ITAT Delhi held that re-assessment proceedings under section 148 for capital gains on property sale were invalid. The property transaction was concluded ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Re-assessment under section 148 invalid for capital gains on same property already assessed

                            ITAT Delhi held that re-assessment proceedings under section 148 for capital gains on property sale were invalid. The property transaction was concluded and assessed in AY 2007-08, with capital gains already offered and accepted by AO. Mere execution of sale deed in 2010 for registration purposes could not create fresh capital gains liability in AY 2011-12 for the same property. Section 50C provisions were inapplicable as no assessable capital gains existed for AY 2011-12. AO's assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 was illegal. Assessee's appeal allowed.




                            Issues:
                            Reopening of assessment beyond the time limit under section 147/143(3); Application of provisions of section 50C/43CA for enhancing sale consideration of immovable assets; Determination of capital gain in the year of registry of sale deed; Charging interest under sections 234A and 234B; Setting off long-term capital gain with carried over loss; Enhancing book profit under section 115JB with capital gain computed under section 50C.

                            Issue 1: Reopening of assessment beyond the time limit under section 147/143(3):
                            The appeal challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer for reopening the assessment for AY 2011-12 beyond the four-year limit from the original assessment year. The appellant contended that the provisions of section 151 were not applicable as the transaction in question did not occur during AY 2011-12. The Tribunal considered the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment, which were based on information received regarding the sale of immovable property. The Tribunal analyzed the facts and held that the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer under section 147 was illegal, as the capital gains had already been assessed for the same property in AY 2007-08, and there was no valid reason for reassessment in AY 2011-12. The grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was upheld.

                            Issue 2: Application of provisions of section 50C/43CA for enhancing sale consideration of immovable assets:
                            The appellant contested the application of sections 50C/43CA by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer to enhance the sale consideration of immovable assets. The Tribunal examined the timeline of events related to the sale of the property and the registration process. It was observed that the capital gains on the property had already been declared and assessed in AY 2007-08. The Tribunal held that the execution of the sale deed in 2010 could not impose capital gains tax liability in AY 2011-12 when the gains had already been offered and assessed earlier. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that there was no valid basis for applying section 50C to the property in AY 2011-12. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was granted.

                            Issue 3: Determination of capital gain in the year of registry of sale deed:
                            The appellant challenged the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer in determining capital gains based on the year of registry of the sale deed rather than the year of sale consideration received and possession given. The Tribunal analyzed the facts surrounding the sale of the property and the assessment history. It was established that the transaction had concluded in AY 2007-08, and capital gains had been assessed accordingly. The Tribunal held that there was no justification for reassessing capital gains in AY 2011-12. The grounds raised by the assessee were accepted, and the appeal was upheld.

                            Issue 4: Charging interest under sections 234A and 234B:
                            The appellant disputed the charging of interest under sections 234A and 234B by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal reviewed the assessment details and the legality of reassessment for AY 2011-12. Given the findings related to the improper jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer and the absence of valid reasons for reassessment, the Tribunal concluded that the interest charged under sections 234A and 234B was unwarranted. The grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was granted.

                            Issue 5: Setting off long-term capital gain with carried over loss:
                            The appellant contested the failure of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer to set off the long-term capital gain with the carried over loss from an earlier year. The Tribunal examined the details of the carried over loss and the assessment history. It was noted that the capital gains had been declared and assessed in AY 2007-08, and there was no valid reason for reassessment in AY 2011-12. The Tribunal held that the failure to set off the carried over loss was unjustified. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were accepted, and the appeal was upheld.

                            Issue 6: Enhancing book profit under section 115JB with capital gain computed under section 50C:
                            The appellant challenged the enhancement of book profit under section 115JB with the capital gain computed under section 50C by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal reviewed the application of section 50C to the property and the assessment history. Given that the capital gains had already been assessed in AY 2007-08, the Tribunal held that there was no legal basis for enhancing the book profit in AY 2011-12. The grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was granted.

                            In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on all the issues raised, highlighting the improper jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer for reassessment in AY 2011-12 when the capital gains had already been assessed in AY 2007-08. The Tribunal emphasized the legal principles and case law supporting the decision to disallow the reassessment and the application of certain provisions to the property in question. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 24/04/2024.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found