ITAT Upholds Addition for Bogus Purchases; Assessee Linked to Hawala Racket; Only Profit from Fraudulent Deals Taxed.

The ITAT upheld the addition of income due to bogus purchases under section 69C, confirming the assessee's involvement in a hawala racket. The appeal was dismissed due to delay, and the ex parte order was maintained. The ITAT instructed the AO to tax only the profit from bogus purchases, not the entire amount, following the Bombay HC's precedent. The assessee must submit relevant information within 90 days to finalize the profit assessment. The ITAT's decision reflects a balanced approach, ensuring only the profit from fraudulent transactions is taxed, aligning with judicial standards.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment of bogus purchases, Delay in filing appeal, Genuineness of purchases, Addition of income, Ex parte order, Taxation of profit from bogus purchases.

Assessment of Bogus Purchases:
The appeal was filed against the appellate order dismissing the appeal against the assessment order that added Rs. 968,724 under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The assessing officer determined the total income at Rs. 1,202,358 due to alleged accommodation bills from two parties. The assessee failed to justify the genuineness of the purchases, leading to the addition. The CIT-A dismissed the appeal due to a delay, as it was filed beyond the statutory time limit. The assessee contended that the appeal was delayed due to the previous accountant's ignorance. Despite multiple notices, the CIT-A decided the appeal ex parte, confirming the addition.

Genuineness of Purchases:
The assessee argued before the ITAT that the purchases were genuine, supported by invoices, payments through account paychecks, audited books of accounts, and stock registers. The departmental representative contended that the assessing officer lacked details and the assessee's non-appearance before the CIT-A invalidated the evidence. The ITAT reviewed the lower authorities' orders and found the assessee benefited from bogus purchases, leading to the addition. The ITAT noted that despite the genuineness claimed by the assessee, the involvement of the suppliers in a bogus hawala racket undermined the purchases' authenticity.

Taxation of Profit from Bogus Purchases:
The ITAT directed the assessing officer to tax the profit from the bogus purchases in line with the Bombay High Court decision in Mohammad Haji Adam & Co. The ITAT instructed the assessee to provide necessary information within 90 days for the AO to confirm the addition based on the profit from tainted purchases. The ITAT ordered the AO to delete the addition of bogus purchases made at 100% and retain the net profit from the differential amount, aligning with the High Court's decision.

This detailed analysis covers the issues of assessment of bogus purchases, delay in filing the appeal, the genuineness of purchases, addition of income, ex parte order, and the taxation of profit from bogus purchases as addressed in the ITAT Mumbai judgment.

---