Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Merit, Despite Initial Acceptance. The SC allowed an application to file review petitions despite a 1067-day delay, lacking satisfactory explanation. Upon examining the Judgment and Order ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Merit, Despite Initial Acceptance.
The SC allowed an application to file review petitions despite a 1067-day delay, lacking satisfactory explanation. Upon examining the Judgment and Order dated 05th March 2019, the SC found no apparent error or grounds for review. Consequently, the review petitions were dismissed due to both the unexplained delay and lack of merit.
Issues: Application for permission to file review petitions with inordinate delay.
In this judgment by the Supreme Court, an application seeking permission to file review petitions was allowed despite an inordinate delay of 1067 days in filing each petition without a satisfactory explanation. The court noted that the review petitions could be dismissed due to the unexplained delay. However, the court proceeded to consider the review petitions on merits as well. Upon perusing the Judgment and Order dated 05th March 2019 which was under review, the court found no apparent error on the record and no grounds for review. Consequently, the review petitions were dismissed both for the delay not being satisfactorily explained and on merits.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
