TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Upholds Strict Adherence to Procedural Timelines, Dismisses Petition Due to 255-Day Delay.</h1> The SC dismissed the special leave petition citing a delay of 255 days, referencing the precedent set in Postmaster General vs. Living Media India Ltd. ... Delay filling SLP - Applicability of provisions of Section 206AA of Act relating to deducting of tax at higher rate in the absence of Permanent Account Number to the payments made to Non Resident – Companies The High Court [2023 (6) TMI 1406 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] dismissed the appeal both on the ground of delay as there was 273 days delay in filing the appeal as well as on merits. There is also a delay of 255 days in filing this special leave petition. HELD THAT:- We are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the petitioners for seeking condonation of delay in filing the special leave petition. In the circumstances, the special leave petition is dismissed on delay keeping open the question of law. In dismissing this special leave petition, we have followed the judgment of this Court in Postmaster General and Ors. vs. Living Media India Ltd. and Anr [2012 (4) TMI 341 - SUPREME COURT] and other cases which have followed the aforesaid judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to delays of 255 days, following the judgment in Postmaster General vs. Living Media India Ltd. The High Court had also dismissed the appeal for a delay of 273 days.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
