Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order cancelling the registration was liable to be set aside for failure to consider the petitioners' reply to the show cause notice, and whether the matter required remand for fresh decision after hearing the petitioners.
Analysis: A show cause notice was issued proposing cancellation of registration on allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The petitioners furnished a reply and additional documents, but the cancellation order proceeded on the premise that no reply had been filed. The recorded reasons did not reflect consideration of the response dated 9 February 2021. An order passed on such an incorrect premise, without dealing with the reply, was held to be mechanical and perverse. The petitioners were also left free to urge all available grounds before the Proper Officer, including alleged non-compliance with Rule 25 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Conclusion: The cancellation order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Proper Officer for reconsideration after taking the petitioners' reply into account and affording them an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: A cancellation order passed without considering the taxpayer's reply to the show cause notice is unsustainable and may be set aside with a direction for fresh adjudication after hearing.