TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether dividend distribution tax payable under section 115O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be restricted by treaty rate under the relevant double taxation avoidance agreements and whether the assessee was entitled to refund of excess DDT. (ii) Whether transfer pricing adjustments could be made to income computed under the Tonnage Tax Scheme in Chapter XII-G of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether dividend distribution tax payable under section 115O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be restricted by treaty rate under the relevant double taxation avoidance agreements and whether the assessee was entitled to refund of excess DDT.
Analysis: Section 115O creates a distinct levy on distributed profits payable by the domestic company and operates as a self-contained code for levy and collection of additional income-tax on dividends. The liability is fastened on the company, the charge is independent of the shareholder's tax position, and the treaty provisions governing dividend income do not apply unless the treaty specifically extends protection to dividend distribution tax. The Special Bench ruling relied upon held that the treaty rate cannot be imported into section 115O merely because the dividend is paid to a non-resident shareholder.
Conclusion: The claim for application of DTAA rates to DDT was rejected and the ground seeking refund of excess DDT failed, thus the issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether transfer pricing adjustments could be made to income computed under the Tonnage Tax Scheme in Chapter XII-G of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Chapter XII-G provides a presumptive and self-contained method of computation based on the tonnage capacity of qualifying ships and the period of holding, and the computation is not dependent on actual receipts, expenditure, or the arm's length price of international transactions. Transfer pricing provisions under Chapter X are machinery provisions for determining arm's length price in ordinary computation, but they cannot be applied where the statutory formula under the Tonnage Tax Scheme already governs the chargeable income and leaves no scope for altering that income through related-party price adjustments.
Conclusion: The transfer pricing adjustments were held to be inapplicable to income computed under the Tonnage Tax Scheme, so this issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: Both appeals were disposed of on the basis that DDT under section 115O is not curtailed by treaty rates unless specifically provided, and transfer pricing provisions do not operate to modify income computed under Chapter XII-G.
Ratio Decidendi: A self-contained charging or computation code prevails over general transfer pricing machinery where the statute excludes such adjustment, and treaty benefits cannot be implied for a domestic levy unless the treaty expressly extends to that levy.
TaxTMI 
