Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ceramic balls used in purification columns were eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, or whether they were excluded as capital goods or equipment.
Analysis: The disputed ceramic balls were used in a bed supporting silica gel in purification columns, and the purification activity was treated as part of the manufacturing chain. The governing test was whether the article was used in or in relation to manufacture, not whether it was physically present in the finished product. The Revenue's objection that the balls did not directly participate in refining and were in the nature of equipment was not accepted, particularly in view of the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's own case and supporting precedent that items used directly or indirectly in the production process remain eligible inputs.
Conclusion: Ceramic balls were held to be eligible inputs for Modvat credit and not disqualified on the ground that they were capital goods or equipment.
Final Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was set aside and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An item used in the manufacturing stream, including for an essential preparatory or purification function, is an eligible input for Modvat credit if it is used in or in relation to manufacture and is not shown to fall within the relevant exclusion.