Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether advance tax collected under Circular No. 50/2006 on timber brought into the State and subsequently stock-transferred outside the State could be treated as input tax so as to attract the restriction under Section 13 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
Analysis: Circular No. 50/2006 was issued to collect advance tax at border check posts on evasion-prone commodities and expressly permitted adjustment of the amount against output tax due. The definition of input tax under Section 2(xxiii) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 contemplates tax paid by a registered dealer to another registered dealer on purchase of goods in the course of business. The tax collected under the Circular was not tax paid on a purchase transaction within that definition. Since the goods were only stock-transferred and there was no taxable sale transaction, the refund and restriction mechanism in Section 13 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 had no application to deny the full credit of the advance tax paid.
Conclusion: The restriction of credit to the amount in excess of 4% was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to credit for the entire amount paid under Circular No. 50/2006.
Ratio Decidendi: Advance tax collected under an anti-evasion circular on import of goods does not become input tax unless it answers the statutory definition of input tax as tax paid on purchase in the course of business.