Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made by the assessee to non-resident suppliers for obtaining computer software were chargeable to tax in India as royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the appeals raised any question of law in view of the Supreme Court decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd.
Analysis: The appeals concerned remittances for purchase or use of computer software from foreign residents. The issue was covered by the Supreme Court decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P.) Ltd., which held that such distribution or end-user licence arrangements do not create any interest or right in copyright so as to amount to royalty, and therefore do not attract tax deduction at source under Section 195 where the DTAA definition is more beneficial. The Court applied that binding position to the present transactions and held that the revenue's contention on royalty was no longer open.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee, and the appeals did not give rise to any question of law.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's appeals failed on the governing legal position and stood dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Payments for resale or use of computer software under EULAs or distribution agreements, which do not confer any copyright interest, are not royalty and do not attract tax deduction at source when the applicable DTAA is more beneficial.