TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the settlements attracted section 12 of the Estate Duty Act on the footing that an interest in the gifted properties had been reserved to the donor; (ii) whether section 10 of the Estate Duty Act applied to the extent that the donor had secured a contractual benefit under the gift deeds.
Issue (i): whether the settlements attracted section 12 of the Estate Duty Act on the footing that an interest in the gifted properties had been reserved to the donor;
Analysis: Section 12 applies only when there is a reservation of an interest in the subject-matter of the settlement, whether express or implied. The gift deeds here conveyed absolute ownership and possession, and the provisions for maintenance or annual payment did not amount to a charge on the properties or create any proprietary interest in them. In the deed concerning the wife, there was not even a reservation of maintenance in the form required by the section.
Conclusion: Section 12 was not attracted.
Issue (ii): whether section 10 of the Estate Duty Act applied to the extent that the donor had secured a contractual benefit under the gift deeds.
Analysis: Section 10 requires that the donee should assume possession and enjoyment to the entire exclusion of the donor, and that the donor should be excluded from any benefit reserved by contract or otherwise. Although possession had been delivered, the deeds for the sons, grandsons and daughter imposed enforceable obligations to maintain the donor, and that contractual benefit was not confined to an interest in the property itself. However, the deed in favour of the wife did not contain a provision amounting to a reservation of maintenance. The duty therefore attached only to the extent of the reserved benefit, not to the whole property, and the benefit had to be valued on the donor's death.
Conclusion: Section 10 applied to the deeds containing contractual maintenance obligations, but only to the extent of the benefit reserved; it did not apply to the wife's deed.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the accountable persons in part, with the settlements being includible in the estate only to the limited extent of the contractual benefits reserved under the relevant gift deeds.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 12 is attracted only by a reservation of interest in the gifted property, while under section 10 any contractual benefit reserved to the donor in a gift deed may be treated as property passing on death, but only to the extent of that benefit.
TaxTMI 
